Thomas Lehrich is pleased to provide our fall Think aBout It segment. An article authored by board members delves into CTE.

Contact Sports and Football

What a New Study Reveals About Traumatic Brain Injuries

By Thomas Lehrich, Vanessa Souders, and Kevin Johnston, NP | Plus One Foundation 

Abstract: Brain research is one of the last frontiers in medical research. Plus One Foundation's education campaign Think aBout It features educational information and outreach on contemporary neurological topics. Education is at the heart of what we do—our Think aBout It campaign aims to dig deeper into all aspects of TBIs and neurological conditions. 

American football is celebrated for its physical intensity, teamwork, discipline, and competitive spirit. Like other contact sports, the long-term consequences of repeated blows to the head of athletes are subject to a new study. 

A newly published study by JAMA Network Open brings this issue into sharper focus. Researchers from Boston University, Mass General, and the Concussion & CTE Foundation examined the brains of 2,362 former National Football League (NFL) players and estimated that approximately 74.5% had chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) when they died. In comparison, the National Death Index reports CTE to be present in less than 1% of typical deaths. The brains were from players that had died between 2008 and 2023. 

The findings extend beyond professional football. They raise important questions about the cumulative effects of repeated head impacts, the adequacy of existing player protections, and the responsibility of sports organizations to safeguard athletes’ health long after their playing careers end. This is not just football, but any sport that involves repeated blows to the head. This includes soccer, boxing, hockey, martial arts, auto racing, and cycling. 

Understanding the Impact of Repeated Head Trauma 

Football, hockey and other collision sports expose players to impacts that can injure the brain. While concussions are an important and widely recognized consequence of these collisions, researchers have become increasingly concerned about the cumulative effects of repeated head impacts, including those that do not produce immediately recognizable concussion symptoms. 

One condition associated with repetitive head trauma is chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE. This progressive neurodegenerative disease is characterized by abnormal accumulations of tau protein and other changes in brain tissue. It has been associated with difficulties involving memory, thinking, behavior, mood, and emotional regulation. The severity is staged as levels I through IV, with IV being the worst. Very few symptoms are noted in the early stages, but it is an insidious disease, accelerated by repeated head traumas. 

Currently, CTE can only be definitively diagnosed by examining brain tissue after death. Consequently, scientists have faced a major challenge in determining how common the disease is among living and retired football players. Many of the brains available for research have come from families who chose to donate them because their loved ones experienced concerning neurological or behavioral symptoms. This creates a potential selection bias: donated brains may disproportionately represent individuals with suspected brain disease. The families donated these brains because they were concerned about behavioral changes that they may have noticed, even if there were no formal medical diagnoses. 

What the New Study Found 

The study, led by researchers affiliated with Boston University's Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center and CTE Center, analyzed medical records from 2,362 former NFL players who died between 2008 and 2023. These players had spent an average of five years in the league. Nearly 400 had donated their brains for scientific examinations. 

Among those brain donors, approximately 93.5% showed evidence of CTE. Although this figure is alarming, it cannot automatically be applied to every former NFL player because brain donors may have been more likely to experience symptoms that prompted their families to participate in research. 

To address this limitation, researchers used medical records from both donors and nondonors to estimate the likely prevalence of CTE across the larger group. They found that former players with documented cognitive symptoms were approximately five times more likely to donate their brains. After adjusting for this difference, the researchers estimated that 74.5% of the deceased former NFL players in the study had CTE pathology at death. 

The study’s senior author Yorghos Tripodis, PhD, a professor of biostatistics at Boston University, emphasized the magnitude of the estimated dementia-related risk. However, the result should be understood as a statistical estimate derived from a model, not a direct brain examination of every player in the study. 

Russell Lonser, a professor of neurological surgery at The Ohio State University who was not involved in the research, described the work as an important effort to correct for selection bias in brain-bank data while cautioning that the findings remain an estimate. 

Why These Findings Matter 

The study's significance extends well beyond professional football. It adds to growing concerns about how repetitive head impacts may affect the brain over time and highlights the need to take neurological health seriously in contact sports. 

For players, the potential consequences can extend well beyond their final game. Cognitive difficulties, emotional changes, memory problems, and other neurological symptoms can affect relationships, employment, independence, and overall quality of life. Families may also shoulder the emotional and practical burdens of caring for loved ones experiencing these challenges. The NFL, college and high school football team owners and management have taken note of these reports and are actively developing safer equipment (such as helmets that absorb more of the impact and softer turf) and rules to reduce helmet-on-helmet contact and other hard hits. 

For the medical community, the findings reinforce the importance of investigating the long-term effects of repeated head trauma. Researchers need better ways to identify individuals at risk, understand how brain injuries develop, and distinguish CTE-related symptoms from other conditions that can cause dementia or behavioral changes. 

The study also highlights a critical limitation: researchers examined former players who had died, so the findings do not establish the prevalence of CTE among current NFL players or provide a precise estimate of any individual player's risk. CTE was first described in 1928 by Dr. Harrison Martland as being 'punch drunk' from boxing. Boxing has also introduced safety protocols to reduce the damaging effects. Other sports, such as cycling and skateboarding, have added helmets and tried to reduce exposure to CTE-inducing contact. Soccer also has been implicated as a major source of CTE cases. 

The Challenge of Diagnosing CTE 

One of the greatest obstacles in addressing CTE is the absence of a definitive diagnostic test for living individuals. Although researchers can identify characteristic brain changes through postmortem examination, they cannot yet establish a definitive diagnosis of CTE in a living athlete. 

This creates a difficult situation for former players and their families. Symptoms such as memory loss, depression, irritability, mood changes, and cognitive difficulties can overlap with those associated with Alzheimer's disease, other neurological disorders, and psychiatric conditions. 

This uncertainty matters. Not every former football player who experiences memory loss, depression, or mood changes has CTE. Similarly, the absence of an established diagnosis does not mean that repeated head impacts are harmless. 

The new study reinforces the importance of developing reliable diagnostic tools, identifying potential indicators of neurological disease, and understanding how brain changes evolve over time. 

Progress in these areas could eventually allow healthcare professionals to identify individuals at greater risk, provide earlier interventions, and better support athletes experiencing neurological difficulties. 

What This Means for Football Safety 

The NFL has introduced various measures intended to reduce head injuries, including changes to playing rules, concussion recognition, and return-to-play protocols. 

These efforts are important. However, the new findings raise a broader question: Are existing protections sufficient to address the cumulative effects of repeated head impacts? 

A major concern is that reducing diagnosed concussions alone may not adequately address the problem. Athletes can experience repeated head impacts without necessarily sustaining a concussion or displaying immediate symptoms. 

Consequently, prevention efforts must look beyond the treatment of diagnosed concussions and consider the broader burden of repetitive head trauma. 

Several areas deserve continued attention: 

• Safer playing techniques: Coaching methods and tackling practices should continue to evolve to minimize unnecessary head contact. 

• Improved equipment: Protective equipment should be continually evaluated and improved, while recognizing that helmets alone cannot eliminate the risk of brain injury. 

• Stronger medical oversight: Athletes need appropriate medical evaluation, transparent concussion management, and carefully monitored return-to-play decisions. 

• Reduced exposure: Sports organizations should examine whether practice structures, training methods, and playing rules can reduce unnecessary repetitive head impacts. 

• Long-term monitoring: Neurological health should remain a priority after retirement, not simply during an athlete's active career. 

Youth and amateur football deserve particular attention. 

Children and adolescents are still developing, and their participation in contact sports raises questions about how best to balance the benefits of physical activity, teamwork, and competition with the potential neurological risks. 

Parents, coaches, schools, and sports organizations must have access to accurate, evidence-based information. No single intervention can eliminate every risk. But prevention, education, medical oversight, and continued scientific research can help reduce avoidable harm. 

Moving Forward: Awareness, Prevention, and Accountability 

This study represents an important contribution to the growing body of evidence concerning repetitive head trauma and long-term brain health. It also demonstrates why researchers must carefully account for selection bias when studying diseases that can only be confirmed after death. 

Several priorities emerge from these findings: 

• Invest in research: Support efforts to understand the mechanisms, progression, and long-term consequences of repetitive head impacts. 

• Improve prevention: Continue evaluating playing rules, tackling methods, equipment, and training practices to reduce unnecessary head trauma. 

• Strengthen medical care: Ensure that athletes receive timely assessment and appropriate follow-up when they experience concussions or neurological symptoms. 

• Educate families and communities: Provide balanced, evidence-based information so athletes and families can make informed decisions. 

• Support former players: Improve access to neurological evaluation, mental health services, rehabilitation, and long-term care as needed. 

These priorities require cooperation among researchers, healthcare providers, athletic organizations, schools, coaches, and families. Protecting athletes cannot be the responsibility of any single group. 

Ultimately, the goal should not be to create unnecessary fear or to dismiss the value of sport. It should be to ensure that athletes understand the risks, receive appropriate protection, and have access to the care and support they need throughout their lives. 

Conclusion 

The findings published in JAMA Network Open are a reminder that the consequences of contact sports and football can extend far beyond the playing field.

The estimated prevalence of CTE among the deceased former NFL players studied underscores the importance of continued scientific investigation, better prevention strategies, improved diagnostic technologies, and long-term support for athletes. 

Important uncertainties remain. Researchers still need to understand how CTE pathology translates into clinical symptoms, why some individuals are more vulnerable than others, and how repetitive head impacts influence neurological health over a lifetime. 

But uncertainty should not become an excuse for inaction. Athletes dedicate enormous amounts of time, energy, and physical effort to the sports they love. They deserve advancing scientific knowledge to make the sport safer. 

Football and other athletics offer tremendous value to individuals and communities. The challenge now is to turn awareness into action, research into progress, and accountability into lasting change. 

The Role of the Plus One Foundation

Plus One Foundation mobilizes resources to inspire hope and enrich the lives of those affected by neurological conditions and educate the community about related issues.

At Plus One Foundation, we provide programming and education for individuals with neurological conditions. Our programming in movement therapy, aquatics and music helps the neurological community with recovery. 

Tom Lehrich, President announces board of directors retreat to be held at University of Washington

The board of directors are meeting the third week of December on the UW campus for the Annual Leaders Retreat. 

As fall begins the board is busy planning the year of programming.  Fall marks a time for planning and is a time for the earth’s autumnal equinox.  Autumnal equinox is when the earth experiences nearly equal day and night, marking the official beginning of autumn in the Northern Hemisphere.  

This astronomical event occurs when the sun crosses the celestial equator, and for those in the Northern Hemisphere, days become shorter and cooler. We know the equinox is also associated with cultural celebrations, like harvest festivals, and increased activity all over the world. 

The board is meeting on the campus of University of Washington to complete the 2026 Strategic Plan and committee goals.  The retreat and strategic sessions is designed to deliver high impact programming and education for the neurological community. 

Tom Lehrich

President

Thomas Lehrich, Board President reviews article: A Second Tempo: Music, Movement, and the Healing Brain 

Why rhythm and motion may be the most human form of neurological rehabilitation.

Abstract: Brain research is one of the last frontiers in medical research. Plus One Foundation's education campaign Think aBout It features educational information and outreach on contemporary neurological topics. Education is at the heart of what we do; our Think aBout It campaign aims to dig deeper into all aspects of TBIs and neurological conditions.

I still remember the first time I witnessed a stroke. It was 2013, and I was seated across from my parents at a modest sushi restaurant, halfway through a plate of tempura. It was the first semester of my undergraduate studies in biology and psychology. I was hungry — for food, yes, but also for understanding. That week, our lectures had turned to the brain: its architecture, its fragility, and the sudden violence of cerebrovascular accidents. On the topic of strokes, my professor introduced the acronym F.A.S.T. — Face drooping, Arm weakness, Speech difficulty, Time to call 911 — a mnemonic meant to transform bystanders into first responders.

As we stepped out of the restaurant into the cool Southern California evening, a family entered. The man beside me collapsed. I caught him instinctively, and in that moment, the textbook came to life: his face drooped to one side, his speech was garbled, his eyes wide with confusion. A few of us lifted him into a chair. His family hovered nearby, helpless, suspended in that liminal space between knowing something is wrong and understanding what it is. The paramedics arrived swiftly. “Stroke,” they said. He would be taken to the hospital. Treated. Stabilized. And then — what? That moment, brief and brutal, marked a turning point. For me, it was the beginning of a lifelong inquiry into the brain’s capacity for damage and repair. For his family, it was the start of a new reality — one shaped not by the event itself, but by the long, uncertain road of rehabilitation that would follow.

The human central nervous system is a biological paradox — at once resilient and exquisitely fragile. It is a latticework of neurons and glial cells, suspended in cerebrospinal fluid, encased in a bony vault barely seven millimeters thick. Within this gelatinous mass — weighing no more than three pounds — resides the totality of our being: memory, movement, emotion, identity. It is the organ of selfhood. And yet, for all its complexity, the brain is notoriously poor at healing. Unlike skin or bone, it does not regenerate with ease. The architecture of neural networks — vast, intricate, and delicately balanced — resists repair. After injury, the environment within the brain becomes hostile to regrowth. Neurogenesis, the birth of new neurons, is limited and often insufficient. What follows is not recovery, but adaptation — a slow, uncertain recalibration of function.

The scale of this challenge is staggering. According to the World Health Organization, over three billion people globally live with a neurological condition. Stroke, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury — each represents a unique disruption of the brain’s structural, chemical, or electrical systems. Some disorders erode the brain cell by cell, others short-circuit its signals, and still others alter its chemistry in ways we barely understand. 

But beneath the clinical language lies a deeper truth: every diagnosis is a story. A family reorients around a new reality. A spouse becomes a caregiver. A child learns to navigate a parent’s silence. One moment, you are sharing dinner; the next, you are deciphering the future through the lens of a CT scan. Neurological trauma does not just affect the brain — it reshapes lives. 

Despite the immense societal and personal burden of neurological disorders, spending in aesthetic medicine far exceeds neurological research funding - things like Botox and balding - especially in the U.S. and UK. This disparity reflects cultural priorities, market dynamics, and the challenges of funding long-term rehabilitation and neuroscience innovation. But perhaps innovative and powerful rehabilitation tools are more accessible than we think. They don’t necessarily require billions of dollars in federal funding – it’s as simple as unlocking the timeless music of Johann Strauss II's "The Blue Danube," and Tchaikovsky's "Waltz of the Flowers", or a well-worn pair of sneakers and the familiar cadence of a favourite song echoing through a quiet room. 

Louis Armstrong once said, “Music is life itself.” It is not merely a backdrop to our existence, but a thread woven through its very fabric — from the muffled rhythms heard in utero through the stretched skin of an expectant mother, to the solemn notes of Taps or Amazing Grace that accompany our final farewells. Music is not incidental; it is elemental. 

But what if music is more than memory? More than mood? What if it is medicine?

Recent studies from Finland, Italy, and the United States are beginning to reframe music not only as art, but also as an intervention. In Helsinki, researchers found that stroke patients exposed to daily music showed enhanced recovery in verbal memory and focused attention. In Milan, rhythmic auditory stimulation improved gait and balance in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. And in Boston, music therapy was shown to reduce anxiety and improve motor coordination in children with traumatic brain injuries. 

The mechanism is as elegant as it is complex. Music activates a constellation of brain regions — auditory cortex, motor cortex, limbic system — creating a neural symphony that promotes plasticity. Rhythmic cues can entrain movement. Melodic patterns can stimulate language centers. Harmony can soothe dysregulated emotional circuits. In essence, music becomes a scaffold upon which the brain can rebuild. 

Movement, too, plays its part. Dance therapy, tai chi, and guided motor exercises have shown promise in restoring proprioception, balance, and coordination. In Turku, Finland, the Tango was found to improve functional motor control, quality of life, and cognition in Parkinson’s patients. When paired with music, the effects are amplified — as if rhythm and motion together unlock a deeper form of healing. 

These are not just anecdotes. They are data. They are evidence. And they are hope.

At Plus One Foundation, music and movement are not ancillary — they are essential. These are not just programs; they are lifelines. We have witnessed lives recalibrated, not by the sterile hum of fluorescent hospital lights, but by the cadence of a drumbeat, the sway of a dance, the quiet dignity of motion reclaimed. For those who have stared into the grayscale void of a CT scan, or sat wordless in the antiseptic stillness of a neurologist’s office, these therapies offer something rare: color, rhythm, agency.

We are opening paths to meaningful recovery. To therapies that are low-cost, low-risk, and profoundly human. For people like the man at the sushi restaurant, whose life changed in a single, silent collapse, these interventions offer a new rhythm. Music is indeed life and may prove to offer an avenue to a renewed life, by the gentle tapping of a foot, to rhythm and blues, to memory and movement — a second tempo begins, guiding the brain towards healing.

About the Author

Jake Petersen is a husband, dog-lover, educator, and executive leader whose work bridges the disciplines of mental health, trauma recovery, and applied neuroscience. He holds a Master of Science in Psychology and Neuroscience of Mental Health from King’s College London, where his research focused on astrocyte-to-neuron reprogramming and neurogenesis in central nervous system repair. Jake currently serves as Chief Operating Officer for Cascade Christian Schools and sits on the executive board of the Plus One Foundation, a nonprofit dedicated to supporting individuals affected by neurological conditions through innovative, accessible therapies. A former professional athlete and U.S. Army officer, Jake brings a unique perspective to resilience, performance, and recovery — integrating scientific rigor with lived experience. His work spans research, crisis leadership, and community outreach, with a focus on translating neuroscience into meaningful, human-centered interventions.

Learn more information about Plus One and the Think aBout It campaign here: Think aBout It | Plus One Foundation

References

Devlin, K., Alshaikh, J. T., & Pantelyat, A. (2019). Music Therapy and Music-Based Interventions for Movement Disorders. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 19(11), 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-019-1005-0

Galgano, M., Toshkezi, G., Qiu, X., Russell, T., Chin, L., & Zhao, L.-R. (2017). Traumatic brain injury: Current treatment strategies and future endeavors. Cell Transplantation, 26(7), 1118-1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963689717714102

Impaired movement timing in neurological disorders: Rehabilitation and treatment strategies. (n.d.). https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12615

Ramaswamy, M., Philip, J. L., Priya, V., Priyadarshini, S., Ramasamy, M., Jeevitha, G. C., Mathkor, D. M., Haque, S., Dabaghzadeh, F., Bhattacharya, P., & Ahmad, F. (2024). Therapeutic use of music in neurological disorders: A concise narrative review. Heliyon, 10(16), e35564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35564

Sihvonen, A. J., Särkämö, T., Leo, V., Tervaniemi, M., Altenmüller, E., & Soinila, S. (2017a). Music- based interventions in neurological rehabilitation. The Lancet Neurology, 16(8), 648–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30168-0

Speranza, L., Pulcrano, S., Perrone-Capano, C., Porzio, U. di, & Volpicelli, F. (2022). Music affects functional brain connectivity and is effective in the treatment of neurological disorders. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 33(7), 789–801. https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2021-0135

Wei, J., Wang, M., Li, S., Han, R., Xu, W., Zhao, A., Yu, Q., Li, H., Li, M., & Chi, G. (2024). Reprogramming of astrocytes and glioma cells into neurons for central nervous system repair and glioblastoma therapy. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 176, 116806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116806

Wei, Y., & Qiao, Z. (2024). Neurologic Music Therapy’s Impact on Neurological Disorders. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 102(12), e70000. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.70000

Wu, C.-C., Xiong, H.-Y., Zheng, J.-J., & Wang, X.-Q. (2022). Dance movement therapy for neurodegenerative diseases: A systematic review. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 14, 975711. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.975711

Thomas Lehrich, Board President, Joins University Entrepreneur Mentor Program

Plus One Foundation’s President, Thomas Lehrich joins as a mentor the Boston University’s inaugural Alumni Terrier Tank, an exciting and high-energy evening that brings together innovation, entrepreneurship, and community.

Lehrich will lend mentorship and support for participants. The group of alumni entrepreneurs will pitch their ventures live to a panel of investors and industry leaders-our “Sharks.” Each venture will be evaluated on its vision, viability, and potential for impact, with winners receiving the opportunity to further develop their ideas with the support of BU talent.

Lehrich will be a resource in working with students and alumni on entrepreneurship. 

Thomas Lehrich, President, Recognizes November as National Alzheimer’s Disease Awareness Month

Thomas Lehrich, President of the Board, Plus One Foundation

recognizes November as National Alzheimer’s Disease Awareness Month, a time to raise awareness about Alzheimer’s disease, and those living with the disease. We recognize the families and caregivers who provide unwavering love and support.

At the Plus One Foundation, we recognize the importance of increasing awareness, supporting continued research, and ensuring that individuals and families affected by Alzheimer’s have access to the resources and care they need. 

Alzheimer’s impacts millions of Americans, touching not only those diagnosed but also the loved ones.

While there is no cure for Alzheimer’s disease, advances in research, early detection, and treatment offer hope for the future. Continued investment in research, education, and caregiver support is essential to improving quality of life and making a meaningful difference for those affected.

This November, I encourage everyone to take a moment to learn more about Alzheimer’s disease, view our webpage. 

Thomas Lehrich, President of the Board